Results after Problem 5
The list of the contest leaders after the fifth problem:
Points |
|
Name |
Country |
School |
Physics teacher |
12,725 |
|
SZABÓ Attila |
Hungary |
Leőwey Klára High School, Pécs |
Simon Péter, Dr Kotek László |
11,535 |
|
Nikita Sopenko |
Russia |
Lyceum No.14, Tambov |
Valeriy Vladimirovich Biryukov |
8,168 |
|
Ilie Popanu |
Moldova |
Lyceuum "Orizont", Chisinau |
Igor Evtodiev |
7,7004 |
|
Jakub Šafin |
Slovak |
Pavol Horov Secondary, Michalovce |
Jozef Smrek |
7,5883 |
|
Lars Dehlwes |
Germany |
Ohm-Gymnasium Erlangen |
Martin Perleth |
6,0833 |
|
Ivan Tadeu Ferreira Antunes Filho |
Brazil |
Colégio Objetivo, Lins, São Paulo |
|
5,8911 |
|
Papimeri Dumitru |
Moldova |
Lyceuum "Orizont", Chisinau |
Igor Evtodiev |
5,8689 |
|
Ion Toloaca |
Moldova |
liceul "Mircea Eliade" |
Igor Iurevici Nemtov; Andrei Simboteanu |
5,6695 |
|
Brahim Saadi |
Algeria |
Preparatory School for Science & Technology of Annaba |
Derradji Nasreddine |
5,5407 |
|
Dinis Cheian |
Moldova |
Lyceuum "Orizont", Chisinau |
Igor Evtodiev |
5,1968 |
|
Jakub Supeł |
Poland |
14th School of Stanisław Staszic, Warsaw |
Włodzimierz Zielicz |
5,0844 |
|
Cristian Zanoci |
Moldova |
Lyceuum "Orizont", Chisinau |
Igor Evtodiev |
4,919 |
|
Alexandra Vasileva |
Russia |
Lyceum "Second School", Moscow |
A.R. Zilberman, G.F. Lvovskaya, G.Z. Arabuly |
3,8105 |
|
Kohei Kawabata |
Japan |
Nada High School |
|
3,7997 |
|
Nadezhda Vartanian |
Russia |
Smolensk Pedagogical Lyceum |
Mishchenko Andrei Anatolievich |
3,7517 |
|
Luís Gustavo Lapinha Dalla Stella |
Brazil |
Colégio Integrado Objetivo, Barueri, Brazil |
Ronaldo Fogo |
3,4205 |
|
Bharadwaj Rallabandi |
India |
Narayana Jr. College, Basheer Bagh, India |
Vyom Sekhar Singh |
2,5937 |
|
Mikhail Shirkin |
Russia |
Gymnasium of Ramenskoye |
Petrova Elena Georgyevna |
2,1 |
|
Krzysztof Markiewicz |
Poland |
XIV Highschool in Warsaw |
Robert Stasiak |
2 |
|
Jaan Toots |
Estonia |
Tallinn Secondary Science School |
Toomas Reimann |
1,903 |
|
Petar Tadic |
Montenegro |
Gimnazija ,,Stojan Cerovic" Niksic |
Ana Vujacic |
1,8606 |
|
Lorenzo Comoglio |
Italy |
Liceo Scientifico del Cossatese e Valle Strona |
Chiara Bandini |
1,6214 |
|
Ng Fei Chong |
Malaysia |
SMJK Chung Ling, Penang |
|
1,4641 |
|
Hideki Yukawa |
Japan |
Nada high school |
|
1,21 |
|
Midhul Varma |
India |
Vidyadham Junior, Hyderabad |
Manikanta Kumar |
1 |
|
Teoh Yee Seng |
Malaysia |
SMJK HENG EE,Penang; SMJK CHUNG LING,Penang |
Hong Siang Ean, Loh Pei Yee |
1 |
|
Task Ohmori |
Japan |
Nada High School |
T.Hamaguchi |
1 |
|
Sharad Mirani |
India |
Prakash Higher Secondary School |
Ruchi Sadana, Sunil Sharma |
1 |
|
Lev Ginzburg |
Russia |
Advanced Educational Scientific Center, MSU, Moscow |
I.V. Lukjanov, S.N. Oks |
0,9801 |
|
Mekan Toyjanow |
Turkmenistan |
Turgut Ozal Turkmen Turkish High School |
Halit Coshkun |
0,81 |
|
Meylis Malikov |
Turkmenistan |
Turgut Ozal Turkmen Turkish High School |
Halit Coshkun |
0,81 |
|
Liara Guinsberg |
Brazil |
Colégio Integrado Objetivo, São Paulo, Brazil |
Ronaldo Fogo |
0,792 |
|
Ulysse Lojkine |
France |
Lycée Henri IV, Paris |
M. Lacas |
0,72 |
|
Rajat Sharma |
India |
Pragati Vidya Peeth,Gwalior |
Mr. Rakesh Ranjan |
0,5648 |
|
Selver Pepić |
Bosnia-Herzegovina |
Fourth Gymnasium Ilidža, Sarajevo |
Rajfa Musemić |
Points for Problem No 5:
3,8876 |
|
Nikita Sopenko |
2,5678 |
|
SZABÓ Attila |
2,1436 |
|
Ilie Popanu |
1,9487 |
|
Papimeri Dumitru |
1,6105 |
|
Cristian Zanoci |
1,435 |
|
Dinis Cheian |
1,2958 |
|
Lorenzo Comoglio |
1,0567 |
|
Ng Fei Chong |
1 |
|
Teoh Yee Seng |
0,9703 |
|
Jakub Šafin |
0,81 |
|
Ion Toloaca |
0,7217 |
|
Lars Dehlwes |
0,5648 |
|
Selver Pepić |
0,5134 |
|
Petar Tadic |
Correct solutions (ordered according to the arrival time; best solutions in bold):
1. Szabó Attila (Hungary)
2. Nikita Sopenko (Russia)
3. Ilie Popanu (Moldova)
4. Papimeri Dumitru (Moldova)
5. Dinis Cheian (Moldova)
6. Cristian Zanoci (Moldova)
7. Ng Fei Chong (Malaysia)
8. Lorenzo Comoglio (Italy)
9. Jakub Šafin (Slovak)
10. Lars Dehlwes (Germany)
11. Petar Tadic (Montenegro)
12. Ion Toloaca (Moldova)
13. Teoh Yee Seng (Malaysia)
14. Selver Pepić (Bosnia-Herzegovina)
(The list is ordered according to the arrival time)
Also, there are two incorrect solutions and two solutions, which are based on correct principles, but contain some mistakes.
Overall number of registered participants: 247 from 42 countries.
—————-
Since the number of correct solutions was relatively low, the following hints were given by the end of the third week:
– study the formula sheet (section V-3) to get an idea of how many eigenfrequencies you need to find; if in difficulties counting the number of oscillators, take it equal to the number of degrees of freedom (how many independent loop currents are needed for a superposition to represent arbitrary current distribution of the circuit);
– make use of the strong inequalities at as early stage as possible, to simplify the mathematical task;
– study the section VIII of the formula sheet; particularly useful are pts. 11, 5, 3, 2 (though, depending on your approach, you may not need all of these formulae).
– in order to find the natural frequencies, you can write down the system of differential equations, and based on that system, write down the characteristic equation, the solutions of which are the natural frequencies. However, note that you can avoid writing down the differential equations. Instead, you can make use of the concept of current and voltage resonances. So, for a voltage resonance, there will be a non-zero voltage amplitude U between two nodes A and B, even if there is no current flowing into the node A (and from the node B). Indeed, if the impedance between the nodes A and B is , we can write |U| = |I||Z|, hence a non-zero U is compatible with I=0 if . Therefore, natural frequencies can be found as the solutions of the equation .
|